I was unfortunate enough to hear Health Secretary Alan Johnson on the radio about an hour ago. What a mealy mouthed bastard, and I used to think he was one of the less bad of the undead in the House of Commons.
He was justifying forcing shopkeepers to hide fags under the counter. He thinks that non-smokers are so weak and feeble that the sight of a packet of fags makes them start smoking, especially kids. Utter crap! I pass casinos on a regular basis but would rather rip my eyes out than go in one. I see mucky mags in newsagents but don't buy them. I see booze on shop counters but am not an alcoholic. I see vegetarian food in shops and restaurants but would rather starve to death. And on, and on, and on, and.......
I gave up fags some time ago but have no problem with people smoking in my company, indeed I would regard it as rude and inhospitable to force visitors to my house who smoke outside for a quick fag. It'll soon be easier to buy pot than perfectly legal tobacco. So why don't the govenment just ban it? Because it needs the cash from the ludicrously high tax on tobacco.
But what really riled me was Johnson using the old bollocks justification that "in a survey 80%of the population agreed with us". In that case if 80% of the population think all MPs should be shot can I please fire the gun? No, I thought not. My point being that just because a majority want it doesn't make it right, take the hanging debate over the years for example.
The fascist bastard really angered me!!
7 comments:
If you think Alan Johnson's a fascist you really have lost your sense of proportion
Politician agrees with public opinion = public demand
Opposition polition agrees with public opinion = populist politics/pandering to populism
Politician disagrees with public opinion = making tough choices/elected to take tough choices
Occasionally "Anonymous" posters make an interesting contribution. Sadly most are fatuous and vacuous like this one. How's that for a sense of proportion you prick?
Spot on Lurch. It's like the prat Spink hiding behind heectate when he really voted for what he wanted.
He did it again this week the charlatan.
What's a 'heectate'?
'heectate' is Beaman's keyboardlexia for 'the electorate' would you believe?
Individualism isn't a word Nu Labour recognise. That's a condition of having Marxism eating away at your brain.
Post a Comment